The federal False Claims Act is a favorite of whistleblowers because it provides broad workplace protections against retaliation and some of the most generous whistleblower rewards.
Whistleblower Cases Under the False Claims Act are for Government Program Fraud
While the False Claims Act, codified at 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq., is the law that most whistleblowers want to use, its application is limited to fraud committed on a government program, including the federal health care program. This limitation comes from the Act's initial purpose: the United States government passed the act during the Civil War in response to fraudsters who were billing the federal government for wartime assistance that they did not actually provide.
This limitation is important because it means that not all whistleblowers can utilize the Civil False Claims Act for their cases. The Act is only an option if a government program or source of funding is being defrauded. Some examples of these government programs are:
Misconduct, even if it is criminal, that does not implicate a government program cannot advance under the False Claims Act.
What to Expect in a Whistleblower Case Filed Under the False Claims Act
Whistleblower cases under the False Claims Act are confusing because they are unique in the legal world: A private citizen can urge federal law enforcement agents to take action against fraudulent activity or even stand in for the government and recover a share of the financial penalties levied against the fraudster.
However, just because they are unique does not mean that False Claims Act cases are complicated or difficult to understand. Cases that are filed under the False Claims Act take the same basic steps as those filed under any other whistleblower statute:
If the agency intervenes, it will take over the investigation and prosecute the case. If the agency decides to sit the case out, you can still pursue the case by acting on the government’s behalf.
The False Claims Act’s Anti-Retaliation Provisions
Like most other whistleblower laws, the False Claims Act includes provisions that forbid workplace retaliation based on legal whistleblowing activities. The False Claims Act’s anti-retaliation provision, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h), though, is slightly broader and more protective than those in other federal whistleblower laws.
Under the False Claims Act, unlawful workplace retaliation for health care providers includes:
Compare this with the Whistleblower Protection Act, another common federal law that whistleblowers use, which defines unlawful workplace retaliation as including:
The False Claims Act’s explicit inclusion of threatening or harassing conduct in the workplace can be important.
Just because the False Claims Act prohibits retaliation for whistleblowing false or fraudulent claims, though, does not mean that your employer will not do it anyway. Many employers are extremely threatened by whistleblowers, as the information that they can bring to light can tarnish the company’s image and end an often lucrative scheme of fraud. In the majority of False Claims act violations, it is not uncommon for employers to fire a whistleblower, knowing that it will lead to a wrongful termination claim and more liability against the company. Many make this decision in the hopes that it will stop the whistleblower case from moving forward.
Suppose you are terminated or retaliated against for legally whistleblowing a false or fraudulent claim, including reverse false claims. In that case, you have legal recourse under the False Claims Act and can recover:
The False Claims Act’s Generous Whistleblower Rewards
One reason why whistleblowers and their attorneys prefer to advance under the False Claims Act rather than other federal whistleblower legislation is that the False Claims Act provides more generous rewards for disclosing evidence of fraud.
Under the False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. § 3730(d)), depending on whether the government intervenes in the case or not, whistleblowers can recover:
Where a whistleblower falls in that range of percentages will depend on “the extent to which the person substantially contributed” to the case.
In addition to this whistleblower reward, successful cases under the False Claims Act also recover the court costs and attorney’s fees incurred.
The “proceeds of the case” are the settlement or verdict amount. This is based on the amount that the government program was defrauded, plus a civil penalty of over $13,000 per violation, based on inflation. That amount is then tripled.
While it is not guaranteed that the proceeds of the case will recover the full amount—many cases under the False Claims Act settle for an amount far less than what is truly owed under the law—the fact that treble damages are imposed by the law can substantially inflate the whistleblower reward, making the False Claims Act an attractive option for people who have evidence of fraudulent conduct.
Oberheiden P.C. © 2024
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins
You are responsible for reading, understanding, and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free-to-use, no-log-in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates, or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys, or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.
Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com intended to be a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional. NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us.
Under certain state laws, the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.
The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 2070 Green Bay Rd., Suite 178, Highland Park, IL 60035 Telephone (708) 357-3317 or toll-free (877) 357-3317. If you would like to contact us via email please click here.
Copyright ©2024 National Law Forum, LLC
